Freight rates have been ticking upward since the fourth quarter of 2025, and the trucking industry has been watching the market closely for signs of the recovery that has been promised, delayed, and promised again for the better part of two years. As of early April 2026, dry van spot rates are running around $2.34 per mile nationally, flatbed is at approximately $2.80, and contract rates have moved up to roughly $2.12 per mile. On the surface, this looks like progress. Rates are higher than they were in November 2025, when spot was at $1.65 per mile and contract was around $2.02. The gap between spot and contract has compressed to approximately 22 cents per mile, down from a spread that was much wider during the depths of the freight recession.
But here’s the critical context that separates the carriers who will navigate this market successfully from those who will misread it: this is not a demand-driven recovery. Rates are up primarily because costs are up. Diesel hit $5.40 per gallon in late March — the highest since late 2022 — and carriers who can cover their cost of operation have been turning down loads that don’t make financial sense. That’s driving the tender rejection rate up to around 14%, which creates the appearance of a tightening market. The underlying freight demand picture remains more modest. Freight volumes are up year-over-year but not signaling a breakout.
Understanding the difference between a cost-driven rate increase and a demand-driven one matters enormously for how you run your business. A cost-driven rate environment is fragile — if diesel prices moderate, the upward pressure on rates weakens without a corresponding increase in demand to sustain them. A demand-driven environment is more durable. Right now, you’re in the former. Here’s what the data says and what it means for your operation.
You are not bullish enough.
— Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️ (@FreightAlley) March 25, 2026
The trucking market is an 11 out of a 10 right now, with some the strongest charts since COVID.
The resurgence of the US industrial economy and manufacturing renaissance is real, along with tightening capacity.
I told Bloomberg Open Interest that… pic.twitter.com/w7FNOpmS3l
Where Rates Are Right Now: Spot vs. Contract
Dry van spot rates have climbed from a November 2025 low of approximately $1.65 per mile to $2.34 per mile in early April 2026. That’s a meaningful recovery, and carriers who held on through the worst of the freight recession are seeing their spot market revenue improve. Flatbed spot rates are running higher, around $2.80 per mile, reflecting continued strength in construction and infrastructure freight. Reefer spot rates have also recovered from recent lows, driven partly by seasonal produce and food service freight increases heading into spring.
Contract rates have moved more modestly. At $2.12 per mile as of February 2026 data — the most recent cycle with full data available — contract is up from $2.02 per mile in November 2025. The spot-to-contract gap, which was inverted during the worst of the freight recession (spot was running below contract, an unusual and painful condition for carriers), has now normalized with spot above contract. By March 2026, that gap had compressed to approximately 22 cents per mile. The compression of the spot-contract gap is a positive indicator for the long-term health of the market, as it suggests that shippers may begin moving more freight back to the spot market as they see spot rates stabilize at sustainable levels.
The Tender Rejection Story: What 14% Really Means
Tender rejection rates are running around 14% as of early April 2026, which is a significant improvement from the lows seen during the freight recession when rejections were in the low single digits. When carriers reject tenders at 14%, it means they’re turning down loads that don’t meet their minimum rate requirements and finding better-paying freight elsewhere. That’s a healthy dynamic for rates, but the critical question is what’s driving it.
Right now, a significant driver of rejections is fuel cost. Carriers are rejecting loads that might have been accepted when diesel was $4.00 per gallon because those loads don’t cover operating costs at $5.40 per gallon. This is cost-driven rejection behavior, not confidence-driven. It’s an important distinction because cost-driven rejections can reverse quickly if fuel prices moderate — carriers who rejected those loads suddenly find them acceptable again, and the rejection rate falls without any increase in freight demand. A true demand-driven tightening would require actual freight volume growth to sustain rejection rates, which provides more durable upward pressure on rates.
That said, 14% rejections do give carriers real negotiating leverage on individual loads right now. Brokers know that carriers are selective and that a below-market rate will likely get turned down. Use that leverage in your rate negotiations. It’s a window that exists today but may not persist through a change in the fuel environment.
Demand Picture: Modest Growth With Important Caveats
Freight demand is modestly higher year-over-year, but analysts caution that the headline numbers may overstate the strength of underlying demand. One complicating factor is the tariff environment. The current trade policy landscape has created pull-forward behavior among some shippers — companies importing goods and moving freight ahead of anticipated tariff increases or changes in trade policy. This front-loading of freight adds volume to the near-term market that represents demand borrowing from the future rather than genuine demand growth. When the pull-forward period ends, freight volumes typically dip as the pipeline runs off the pre-stocked inventory.
The consumer economy, which ultimately drives the freight that moves across the country, remains mixed. Consumer spending has held up better than some forecasters expected, but there are clear signs of stress in lower-income consumer segments. Housing-related freight — appliances, furniture, building materials — remains suppressed compared to the 2021-2022 boom levels. Industrial production has been choppy. The manufacturing sector, which generates significant freight, has seen some improvement but remains below the levels that would signal a robust freight expansion.
Capacity: Who Left and What It Means for the Market
The freight recession of 2023-2025 drove a significant number of carriers out of the market. Small fleets and owner-operators who entered the business during the freight boom of 2020-2022 — when rates were exceptional and access to equipment financing was easy — have been exiting steadily as rates collapsed and costs climbed. Carrier authority revocations have been running at elevated levels for over two years. This capacity reduction has been a key factor supporting the rate recovery, because the same volume of freight is now being served by a smaller pool of carriers.
The carriers who are still operating in April 2026 have survived a brutal two-year culling. They are, as a group, more operationally efficient and financially disciplined than the marginal operators who have left the market. This is actually a positive structural development for rate sustainability — the remaining carrier pool is less likely to accept desperately low rates just to cover variable costs, which was a significant factor suppressing rates during the worst of the recession. The 14% tender rejection rate reflects this disciplined approach from a leaner carrier base.
The caveat on capacity is that large carriers have not meaningfully reduced their fleets during this period. Publicly traded truckload carriers have maintained their equipment and driver bases, waiting for the rate environment to improve. As rates recover, those large fleets can absorb additional freight volume without corresponding increases in carrier count, which limits how far spot rates can rise before large carriers start pulling volume back from the spot market into their contracted networks.
Lane Dynamics: Where Rates Are Strongest Right Now
Not all lanes are created equal in the current market. Flatbed continues to outperform dry van significantly, and operators who can run flatbed are seeing much better rate environments. The infrastructure spending that has been flowing through the economy since the passage of major infrastructure legislation continues to generate construction and industrial freight that flatbed carriers serve. If you have flatbed capability and aren’t positioning your truck in regions with heavy construction activity, you’re likely leaving money on the table relative to what’s available in your equipment class.
For dry van, the Southeast and Midwest continue to show the most consistent freight density. Southeast-to-Northeast corridors have seen improving rates as spring produce season adds reefer capacity pressure and tight reefer availability spills over into dry van demand on some lanes. California outbound continues to struggle relative to historical norms as port volumes remain complex and regulatory costs in the state continue to drive some carriers to reduce their California exposure. Texas lanes have shown improvement, driven by energy sector freight and continued population and business growth in major Texas metros.
What Shippers Are Doing and How It Affects You
Shippers spent the freight recession locking in favorable contract rates and reducing their spot market exposure. As the spot-contract gap narrows, the incentive to lock up contract capacity becomes more pressing for shippers who see rates recovering. Some shippers are already approaching carriers about 2026-2027 contract negotiations, and the dynamics of those conversations are different than they were eighteen months ago. Carriers have more leverage than they did when the spot market was below contract and there was excess capacity at every truck stop.
Amazon’s announcement that fuel and logistics-related surcharges will apply to U.S. and Canadian sellers using Fulfillment by Amazon starting April 17 is a signal worth noting. Amazon is passing fuel cost increases through to its shipper network, which is consistent with what is happening across the freight ecosystem. When fuel costs this much, the pressure to recover it somewhere in the supply chain intensifies at every level. As a carrier, you are at the end of that chain, and the most effective way to protect your position is to negotiate rates and fuel surcharge terms that reflect actual fuel costs rather than accepting rates set when diesel was a dollar cheaper.
What the Rest of 2026 Looks Like
The second half of 2026 rate trajectory depends heavily on two variables: fuel prices and freight demand. If diesel moderates to the $4.30-$4.90 range that forecasters project for Q2 and if consumer demand holds up, the market could continue its gradual improvement. If the pull-forward demand from tariff front-loading unwinds sharply, the mid-year could see a softening in volumes that tests whether the rate gains of Q1 2026 are durable. If fuel stays elevated or spikes again, the cost-driven tightening continues but carrier attrition accelerates among operators who cannot sustain the margin compression.
The most likely scenario, based on current data, is a market that continues to improve gradually through 2026 without a dramatic breakout. The light at the end of the freight recession tunnel is real, but the tunnel is still longer than many operators hoped. Carriers who have managed their costs tightly, maintained their equipment, and built relationships with reliable shippers and brokers during the downturn are best positioned to capture the upside as conditions continue to improve.
What to Do With This Market Right Now
For carriers currently operating in the spot market, the 14% tender rejection environment creates genuine negotiating leverage. Use it on every load — know your cost per mile with current fuel prices and decline loads that don’t cover it. This is not the time to haul cheap freight hoping the volume makes up for the margin. Every under-priced load accepted is a subsidy to a shipper who will continue to offer below-cost rates as long as someone takes them.
For carriers with contract customers, now is a reasonable time to open conversations about rate adjustments that reflect the fuel cost environment. Shippers who have benefited from contract rates negotiated during the recession are going to need to negotiate renewals eventually, and a proactive conversation that references current fuel costs and market spot rates is more effective than waiting until the contract expires and facing a shipper who has had time to shop alternatives.
Bottom Line
April 2026’s freight market is better than it was a year ago — rates are up, rejections are up, and the spot-contract gap has normalized. But the improvement is being driven more by cost pressures and capacity attrition than by robust demand growth, and that distinction matters for how durable the rate recovery will be. Carriers who understand the mechanics of this market — cost-driven tightening, modest demand growth, fragile pull-forward volumes, and a lean but disciplined remaining carrier pool — can position themselves to capture the upside while managing the downside risks. Those who read the improving rate trend as the all-clear for complacency may find themselves caught when the cost environment shifts and the temporary tightening reverses.
Questions Carriers Ask
Where are spot rates right now compared to contract rates?
As of early April 2026 the post cites dry van spot around $2.34 per mile nationally, flatbed at approximately $2.80, and contract rates near $2.12 per mile. The spread between spot and contract has compressed to approximately 22 cents per mile.
Rates are up from last fall, so is the freight recovery real?
Rates have improved since November 2025, when spot was at $1.65 per mile and contract was around $2.02, but the post cautions the recovery is not what it seems on the surface. Demand growth is modest, so much of the improvement comes from capacity leaving the market rather than booming freight volumes.
What does the tender rejection rate tell me as a small carrier?
Tender rejections measure how often carriers turn down contracted loads, and rising rejections signal tightening capacity. The post digs into what the 14 percent figure really means: genuine strain in carrier networks, which tends to push more freight onto the spot market where small carriers operate.
Keep learning: Shippers Are Locking Up Dedicated Capacity at the Fastest Pace Since 2020: The Dedicated Conversion Play to Run on Your Best Shipper This Month and The 10% Tariff Wall Comes Down July 24: Four Moves Small Carriers Should Make Before the Import Whipsaw Hits Their Lanes.

Innovative Logistics Group